The POTUS is only a well trained puppet.....

Many geopolitical observers and “experts” in my country India; are giving close attention and undue importance to the 2024 Presidential Elections in the USA. 

India being a large mix of quasi–socialist, communist influenced left–wing intellectuals on one side of the political spectrum and with the currently very vocal Nationalist-pride infused influencers on the opposite side; are forecasting how bi-lateral relations between India and the USA will develop or deteriorate, based on whether the Republican or the Democrat candidate wins this 2024 election. The reality is that neither candidate is going to favor India, beyond the commercial and political requirements of their own country. As history is witness, the foreign policy of the USA is immoral, unethical and prone to violence since their very existence as an independent nation, as can be noted from the synopsis below.

The history of U.S. foreign policy, including military and covert actions, spans a wide range of events where the country has used its power to influence or destabilize other nations. Here, I will outline key periods and incidents with historical backing, focusing on those that involved direct or indirect use of violence or economic destabilization.

1. Early Years and Expansionist Policies (1776–1800s)

• War of Independence (1775–1783): While the American Revolution was a war for independence, it set a precedent for military action as a means to achieve political ends.
• Manifest Destiny and Displacement of the Natives of the Land: Throughout the 19th century, the U.S. pursued aggressive westward expansion, leading to wars and forced removals of Native American tribes, resulting in significant loss of life and cultural destruction.

2. 19th Century Foreign Interventions

• Mexican-American War (1846–1848): The U.S. invaded Mexico, leading to Mexico ceding large territories (present-day California, Nevada, Utah, etc.) under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo.
• Spanish-American War (1898): The U.S. intervened in Cuba's fight for independence from Spain. This conflict resulted in U.S. control over former Spanish colonies like Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines.

3. Early 20th Century: “Banana Wars”

• Central America and the Caribbean: The U.S. military intervened in countries such as Nicaragua (1912–1933), Haiti (1915–1934), and the Dominican Republic (1916–1924). These interventions were largely aimed at protecting American commercial interests and maintaining regional stability.
• Philippine-American War (1899–1902): Following the Spanish-American War, the U.S. fought against Filipino independence fighters, leading to significant casualties and widespread destruction.

4. Cold War Era (1947–1991)

• Korean War (1950–1953): The U.S. led a United Nations coalition to repel North Korean and Chinese forces, creating a longstanding division of Korea.
• Vietnam War (1955–1975): The U.S. engaged in a prolonged conflict in Vietnam to counter the spread of communism, resulting in millions of deaths and widespread devastation.
• Coup in Iran (1953): The CIA orchestrated Operation Ajax to overthrow Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh and reinstate the Shah, driven by concerns over oil nationalization.
• Guatemala (1954): The CIA-backed Operation PBSUCCESS overthrew President Jacobo Árbenz after he sought land reforms affecting American business interests (e.g., United Fruit Company).
• Chile (1973): The U.S. supported the coup that ousted President Salvador Allende, leading to the establishment of Augusto Pinochet's military dictatorship.
• Nicaragua and the Contras (1980s): The U.S. funded Contra rebels in their fight against the Sandinista government, which involved significant human rights abuses.
• Bay of Pigs Invasion (1961): An unsuccessful CIA-sponsored attempt to overthrow Fidel Castro in Cuba.

5. Post-Cold War and Modern Interventions

• Iraq (1991, 2003): The U.S. led a coalition during the Gulf War in 1991 to expel Iraqi forces from Kuwait. In 2003, the U.S. invaded Iraq under the pretext of eliminating weapons of mass destruction, leading to prolonged conflict and instability.
• Afghanistan (2001–2021): The U.S. invasion was a response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, initially targeting Al-Qaeda and the Taliban but resulting in a two-decade-long war with significant casualties and an eventual U.S. withdrawal.
• Libya (2011): U.S.-led NATO forces conducted airstrikes that contributed to the toppling of Muammar Gaddafi, leaving the country in a state of ongoing conflict.

6. Economic Sanctions and Covert Operations

• Sanctions on Cuba (1960s–present): U.S. sanctions aimed at isolating Cuba economically following the Cuban Revolution.
• Iran Sanctions: Various economic sanctions to curb nuclear capabilities have impacted the Iranian economy.
• Interventions via Covert Operations: The CIA and other agencies have engaged in numerous operations to sway elections or destabilize governments, such as those in Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa.
•  The U.S. has utilized a combination of military might, covert operations, and economic measures to influence global politics and economics. Each of these actions seem to have complex motivations, including political, economic, and ideological interests. However, in reality, the geopolitics of the USA is never about winning a conflict, as can be seen that over the years the USA has faced political and military defeat in almost every war that they started. The only purpose is to destabilize regions and the economies of the countries with the hope that the USA can then control these war torn economies.
  

The reality is that the President of the USA is not really a ‘leader of the free world’, a myth that has been propagated over the past few decades by a continuous and effective public relations strategy. The President of the USA is not the only power center of that country. There are three other centers of power that heavily influence the foreign policy of the USA.

The first is the military arms manufacturing lobby that has the backing and support of the military bureaucracy of the US government, and who in turn are heavily favored by the military lobby with regular and mostly immoral gifts. Corrupt money can be tracked and used in legal prosecution of the bureaucrats, but moral corruption in the form of easy access to contraband pharmaceuticals, illegal narcotics and sexual playmates (of all types) is part of a regular menu of favors in their politics.

The second center of power is the military–intelligence agencies mafia. With an annual budget of over a Trillion dollars (12 zeros after the initial digit), these agencies prepare “threat reports” for the political class and create a sense of constant insecurity among the members of their Congress and the people of their country. The intelligence agencies have no real audit or over-watch over their actions and have been caught many times in spreading misinformation and lies, but no high-ranking member of their organizations or the American military has ever been investigated, prosecuted or punished for illegality.

The third center of power is the cabal of the leaders of the two political parties. This cabal comprises of former Presidents (and in some cases their wives), former high-ranking officials of past administrations, political financiers, and political lobbyists. In many cases, some individuals are a mixture of some or all of the above defined roles.

The President of the United States is nothing more than a puppet of these three power centers; from the time they decide on the candidates for the election to controlling the winning candidate for the subsequent four years in power. And repeat every four years. 

That is the reality of American politics, and instead of the overused cliché ‘God Bless America’ the people of that country should say: “God Save Us from America”.  

 

 

 

Human Rights violations in the USA

The United States of America is no longer the ‘land of the free’. Many of the universal basic human rights are either being curtailed by legislation or have been outlawed entirely.

 Freedom of Assembly:

 Sixteen states introduced 23 bills restricting the right to protest, with five bills enacted in four states. Many of the bills would criminalize specific forms of protest, such as protests near fossil fuel pipelines, or increase penalties for existing crimes, such as “riot” or blocking roadways. In Mississippi, organizers were required to obtain written permission from state law enforcement before holding a protest near the Mississippi statehouse or other government buildings, enabling state officials to approve or disallow protests, including those against the actions of state officials. North Carolina heightened penalties for existing “riot” offenses and for protests near pipelines.

 Sexual Violence against Ethnic Native Women:

 American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women face highly disproportionate rates of sexual violence. According to the most recent government data approximately 56% of AI/AN women had experienced sexual violence – more than twice the national average – and 84% had experienced some type of violence. A 2018 survey found that Alaska Native women were 2.8 times more likely to experience sexual violence than non-Indigenous women. Among the AI/AN women who had experienced sexual violence, the data shows that 96% had experienced sexual violence by at least one non-Indigenous perpetrator. US law continued to restrict the prosecutorial jurisdiction of Tribes, which prevented their ability to prosecute non-Indigenous perpetrators of violence against Indigenous women. AI/AN survivors also continued to face barriers in accessing post-rape care, including access to a forensic examination, which is necessary if a criminal case is to be brought against the perpetrator.

 Restriction of the Right to Abortion:

 Following the 2022 US Supreme Court decision that ended federal protections around the right to abortion, 15 states implemented total bans on abortion or bans with extremely limited exceptions, impacting millions of people of reproductive age. Many other states implemented six-week, 12-week, or 15-20-week bans. Laws changed quickly and faced complicated challenges, creating a culture of uncertainty for many seeking abortion care. Multiple states sought to criminalize, or have criminalized, medication abortion, traveling out of state to receive abortion care, or assisting someone in a state with an abortion ban for traveling to receive abortion care.

 In November, voters in Ohio passed a state constitutional amendment to protect access to abortion. The USA continues to impose multiple restrictions on funding for abortion, even in states where abortion was legal, which disproportionately impacts Black and women of other no9n-white races. The federal Hyde Amendment continues to block Medicaid funding (a government-funded program that provides health coverage for limited categories of people on low incomes) for abortion services, placing an unnecessary financial burden on pregnant people seeking abortion, particularly women of non-white racial groups and low-income people.

 Hate Crime and Discrimination:

 Discrimination and violence against LGBTI people and people of African ethnicity are widespread. LGBTI people are nine times more likely than non-LGBTI people to be victims of violent hate crimes. The descendants of enslaved Africans, African Americans and Indigenous Peoples continued to live with inter-generational trauma, as well as the detrimental economic and material impacts of the legacy of slavery and colonialism. Following the Hamas attacks in Israel on 7 October, and the subsequent Israeli bombardment and ground invasion of Gaza, antisemitic and Islamophobic incidents against people who were perceived to be Jewish, Muslim, Israeli or Arab has increased exponentially.

 Excessive Use of Force Policy by the Police:

According to media sources, police shot and killed 1,153 people in 2023. Black (skin) people were disproportionately impacted by the use of lethal force, comprising nearly 18.5% of deaths from police use of firearms, despite representing approximately 13% of the population. Black people were subject to overall police use of force at a rate 3.2 times greater than white people in 2022, according to the report. That disparity is more severe than lethal force trends; Black people were killed by police at 2.6 times the rate of white people in 2022.

Police in the US use force on at least 300,000 people each year, injuring an estimated 100,000 of them. Non-fatal incidents of police use of force, including stun guns, chemical sprays, K9 dog attacks, neck restraints, beanbags and baton strikes. Thirty-one agencies disclosed that, on average, 83% of people subjected to force across those jurisdictions were unarmed, the agencies reported.

Fewer than 40% of use-of-force incidents originated with reports of violence or involved a violent crime charge. This mirrors patterns for lethal force, with data suggesting the majority of people killed by police are not accused of violent or serious crimes.

Arbitrary detention without access to a Court Trial:

Thirty Muslim men remained arbitrarily and indefinitely detained in the US detention facility in Guantánamo Bay, in violation of international law. Four individuals were transferred to third countries in 2023. Sixteen of the remaining detainees have been cleared for transfer, some for over a decade, without progress. Congress continued to block the transfer of any Guantánamo detainee to the USA. There continued to be no accountability, redress or adequate medical treatment for the many detainees who have been subjected to torture and other ill-treatment and/or enforced disappearance.

Despite the US Supreme Court ruling in 2008 that Guantánamo detainees have a right to habeas corpus, detainees continued to be denied hearings. The US government’s “global war on terror” framework, which continued to defy international law, hampered the ability of federal courts to order the release of detainees.

 Unlawful Killings by the US Government:

The USA continued to use lethal force in countries around the world and withheld information regarding the legal and policy standards and criteria applied by US forces to the use of lethal force. Every administration persisted in its denial of well-documented cases of civilian deaths and harm, and failed to provide truth, justice and reparation for civilian killings in the past. Over the past decade, NGOs, UN experts and the media have documented potentially unlawful US drone strikes that have caused significant civilian harm, in some cases violating the right to life and amounting to extrajudicial executions, especially in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen; and parts of Africa.

The continued supply of munitions to conflict zones violates US laws and policies regarding the transfer and sale of arms, including its Conventional Arms Transfer Policy and Civilian Harm Incident Response Guidance, which together are meant to prevent arms transfers that risk facilitating or otherwise contributing to civilian harm and to violations of human rights or international humanitarian law; policies that are willfully and blatantly ignored by the U.S. Government.

The UN reports on Human Rights Violations by the USA:

Earlier this month, the United Nations Human Rights Committee delivered a searing report highlighting the U.S. government’s failure to meet its human rights obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). This international treaty, ratified by the U.S. in 1992, is one of only three key human rights treaties that the U.S. has ratified. The U.N. committee’s concluding observations echo many of the concerns and recommendations raised by civil society groups last month during the U.S. review, where they sounded the alarm on violations of various human rights issues including Indigenous rights, voting rights, freedom of expression and assembly, gender equality and reproductive rights, criminal legal reform, immigrants’ rights, and more.

Essentially; in the United States of America it’s human rights situation in continues to deteriorate and human rights have been increasingly polarized. While a ruling elite holds political, economic, and social dominance, the majority of ordinary people are increasingly marginalized, with their basic rights and freedoms being continuously disregarded.

This is the reality of human rights in America today. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proportionate Response to terrorism, or overkill

On 11^th September 2001, 19 Muslim terrorists divided into four teams carried out a targeted attack against the United States of America that killed 2,977 people immediately and thousands suffered health disorders due to the toxic dust spread from the debris of the attack sites. In retaliation, USA invaded Afghanistan to hunt down the Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, who they had identified as the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks. The Afghanistan invasion by the USA and its allies led to other conflicts worldwide and the total fatalities of this 22 years War-on-Terror is estimated by the Costs of War Project to be over 4.5 million. [Let that number sink into our minds – 4.5 million dead over a period of 22 years].

Not satisfied with the invasion of Afghanistan, the USA, under then President George W. Bush began actively motivating their leadership and their allies for a military intervention in Iraq in late 2001. In the lead-up to the invasion, the United States and the United Kingdom falsely claimed that Saddam Hussein was developing weapons of mass destruction, covertly supporting al-Qaeda and that he presented a threat to his neighbours and to the world community. Throughout the years of 2001 to 2003, the Bush Administration worked to build a case for invading Iraq, and the Iraq War officially began on 20 March 2003, when the US, joined by the United Kingdom, Australia, and Poland, launched a "shock and awe" bombing campaign. Shortly following the bombing campaign, US-led forces launched a ground invasion of Iraq.

Shortly after the invasion of Iraq, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, the U.S. Defence Intelligence Agency, and the British M.I6 publicly discredited the evidence related to the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (which never existed) as well as Iraq’s alleged links to al-Qaeda. At this point George W. Bush and his co-conspirator Tony Blair (the then Prime Minister of the United Kingdom) shifted to secondary rationales for the war, such as Saddam Hussein’s human rights record, and as per GW Bush, their holy crusade to promote democracy in Iraq. There is no doubt that the vast reserves of highly pure crude oil did set the stage for the Western armies’ invasion of Iraq, greatly increasing the incentives to take over Iraq by any means possible. In this political greed for controlling the oil reserves in Iraq, the USA lost 4,507 soldiers, the UK lost 179, and other countries that comprised the ‘coalition of the unwilling’ lost 139, bringing the invading forces total to 4.825 lives sacrificed.  On the other side, the Iraqi forces lost 17,690 soldiers, and over 100,000 civilians were killed.

As the world knows, the USA and its allies had to vacate Iraq by 2011; losing men, materials and any semblance of honour, having handed the country of Iraq to a local government supported by Iran. In 2014, with the rise of the Islamic State in that region, the USA sent in 5,000 troops to “assist” the Iraqi government, however the Iraqi parliament voted to have the US military presence removed in 2020.

In an almost identical fashion, the USA vacated Afghanistan in a hurry on 30 August 2021, a withdrawal that was seen across the world in the media. In the early hours of 31 August, the Taliban (whom the US had declared as terrorists in 2001 and had tried hard to defeat for 22 years) marched unopposed into Kabul and declared that Afghanistan was finally free of the invaders.

Coming to the present war of Israel against HAMAS, Hezbollah, the Yemen Houthis and Iran itself.

The war began on 07 October 2023, when Hamas–led terrorists groups launched an attack that breached the Gaza–Israel barrier, attacking Israeli civilian communities and military bases. During this attack 1,139 Israeli and foreign nationals were killed and 251 were taken hostage and kidnapped into Gaza. In retaliation Israel invaded Gaza on 27 October 2023 and to date, their bombing campaign has killed over 40,000 Palestinians in Gaza. Exchange of strikes between Israel and Lebanese militant group Hezbollah have been occurring along the Israel–Lebanon border and in Syria and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights since 8 October 2023. It is currently the largest escalation of the Hezbollah–Israel conflict to have occurred since the 2006 Lebanon War. Significant escalation in this conflict occurred in Sept 2024 with the Hezbollah being targeted by Israeli air-strikes and targeted assassinations of Hezbollah commanders. More than 1,000 people have been killed in the last two weeks of September in Lebanon and more continue to die as Israel keeps up its assault.

So, the moot question is: How many lives being destroyed can be defined as a “proportionate response” to terrorism? The USA’s war-on-terror impacted over six million civilians, the current Israel–Hamas war will claim many thousands more. It is very clear to any geo-political observer that Israel will not stop till it runs out of money or military munitions, or both. Unlike the USA, UK or EU countries, Israel is fighting for its very existence as a country and a negotiated peace with terrorists is not on their agenda. The Israeli Prime Minister has been very clear in his recent address to the United Nations. Only the complete surrender of Hamas (and possibly Hezbollah) will bring this conflict to an end, and there might – just might – be a fractured peace.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jammu And Kashmir State Elections 2024 - a realistic perspective

The upcoming legislative elections in the state of Jammu & Kashmir are crucial to the unity, security and safety of the nation of Bharat. This election will define how the voters of J&K consider the concept of democracy. On one hand the leading party of our country, the BJP [Bharatiya Janata Party] has worked hard to ensure that most of the inequalities in the Kashmir society were removed. Since the abrogation of Articles 35A and 370 in 2019 and then-on to 2024, incidents of rioting and stone-pelting against the police and the Army dropped over 80%, mass protests against the government dropped a massive 97%, Pakistan sponsored terrorist attacks dropped 60% with 700 plus terrorists being eliminated, and civilian casualties due to terrorism dropped 50%.

For the people of Kashmir, the effects of normal life-style is now apparent. Schools have been finishing their curriculum on time, businesses have received a boost due to normalcy and tourism has increased rapidly. Over the last 5 years, improved connectivity to Kashmir has been made possible with the 272 kms long Udhampur – Srinagar – Baramulla rail link that is semi operational at this time, the Amritsar – Katra expressway (including the 13 kms long Zojila tunnel) that is now fully operational, with work in progress to upgrade the 197 kms long Jammu – Poonch Road and the 94 kms long Srinagar – Baramulla expressway.

Increasing peace and normality has allowed an increase in the air-connectivity to Kashmir and Jammu with 122 flights per day that transport 4.4 million passengers per year since 2021, an increase of 100% since 2018-19. Five years of stability and reduction in terrorism has brought the democratic aspirations of the people of J&K to the forefront. The recent elections to the Parliament of Bharat saw a sharp increase in the number of candidates, since the youth are now keen and ready to participate in the government’s decision-making process and feel the need to participate in the political process. This reflects the two major issues of the region. The first is that the youth of Kashmir understand that a strong state of Bharat is a prerequisite for progress and prosperity. The second is that every political party has to face the stark realization that for the common voters, what matters is road connectivity, uninterrupted electric supply and fresh drinking water. The people want more hospitals, schools, colleges and universities; a better infrastructure and most of all, gainful employment.

The political party that can convince the voters, that their aspirations will be fulfilled and improve their life-style, without ignoring the issues of development and democratic governance, will be the party that will gain the support of the voters. No doubt, that the current ecosystem has failed to deliver fully on the public welfare aspirations of the people of Kashmir, but it is equally true that with the projects that are underway (or have already been completed), the state is on its way towards becoming more progressive and prosperous. The budget of the state has always been heavily enriched by the Union government and post the current polls, there is no reason for this to be discontinued. The Union government and the soon to be elected state government cannot ignore the need to keep welfare and development projects on-track. Distribution of benefits to every section of society in a fair and equitable manner empowers the people and this has been already experienced by the people after the local body elections. There is no doubt that the people of J&K are eager to participate in the coming elections and to ensure their future security, safety and prosperity.

With the progress in stability ongoing in Jammu & Kashmir; many nations that are against the growth of our country and stability across all states have started taking action to destabilize this process. Pakistan, as usual, is in the forefront of increasing the terrorist’s attacks within the State of J&K. The current infiltration by Pakistan trained terrorist is an overt and clear attempt by Pakistan to support the anti-Bharat elements in the State. Prominently, these are the Abdullah and Mufti family members who still believe that they can circumvent democratic norms and return the state to its earlier version of an autocratic fiefdom of these pro-Islamic politicians. The political apparatus of both these families have declared their manifesto for the upcoming elections, where they have highlighted their desire to reimpose article 370 on the state and essentially divide the population along religious and sectarian lines. The prepoll alliance between Abdullah’s National Conference Party and the Congress Party headed by Rahul Gandhi is considered as a clear indication that the Congress Party wants to destabilize the state for any political advantage that it can achieve through this strategy.

Mukhtar Khan, an Associated Press photo-journalist whose is from Kashmir, writes a news article dated 5 April 2024 on the website of the Conversation (UK) as to how the Muslim people of Kashmir are “apprehensive” of the election process since according to him, the Union government’s decision to remove the autonomous status of J&K by abrogating Articles 35A and 370 is controversial and against the rights of the Kashmir people to enjoy a special lifestyle at the expense of the taxpayers of the entire country. The world needs to know and understand that the Kashmir after the abrogation of its autonomous status has been a growing economy, strongly standing on its own capabilities and abilities, whereas before this change, the state was dependent on subsidies offered by the Union government. When journalists like Mukhtar Khan attempt a misleading narrative the important question to ask is; whether Associated Press which is an organization owned by liberal newspapers of New York, have an agenda to spread disinformation on behalf of Pakistan?

Al–Jazeera, the government owned mouth-piece of Qatar’s ruling family, the al-Thanis’, has the shameless audacity to raise false accusations of restriction of press freedom and curtailed civil liberties in J&K; when such civil liberties, press freedom or democracy as an institution do not exist in Qatar. The al-Thani’s are well known for their support and funding of global terrorists, especially Hamas and the Taliban, and Al-Jazeera’s attempts to help Islamic terrorists’ supporters to publicize their anti-Bharat narrative, surely makes them the leading presstitutes of the world.

Reuters reporters Rupam Jain and Kanupriya Kapoor in their article of January 12, have stated without any ambiguity that “Modi’s Hindu nationalist party is counting on the minority [non-Muslim] communities vote as it pushes to take control of India's part of the Himalayan region that is hotly contested by neighboring Pakistan and has been governed almost exclusively by Muslim chief ministers”, thereby striving to create a religious divide between communities there. These two reporters further say that “For many of Jammu and Kashmir's Muslims, the BJP's policies upending decades of autonomy and privilege represent a dangerous new phase in what they see as a nationwide push to champion the rights of the Hindu majority over minority groups”. The crucial part of this statement is that Jain and Kapoor are in favor of local Muslim autonomy and privilege, instead of a democracy being availed by every section of society; many of whom were not allowed to be part of the democratic process in the era of special privileges under articles 35A and 370. Does this Reuters article highlight the policy of the United States of America to interfere and influence the elections of our sovereign country?

Rifat Fareed, whose name appears on many anti-Bharat articles published on Al-Jazeera and Deutsch Welle {DW] of Germany, regularly spreads fake news through these two main platforms while trying to appear as if he/she/it is on-ground in Srinagar, Kashmir. However, since Rifat Fareed cannot be tracked down on the internet, it can be assumed that this name is associated with Pakistan and those forces that are against stability and peace in Kashmir. It is no surprise that DW itself is so heavily compromised in favor of Islam and radical Islamic politics that it is no longer considered to be either credible or non-partisan.

The British Broadcasting Corp [BBC] in its coverage of Kashmir, is biased towards Islamic society and its politics. BBC itself has been the center of unsavory controversies for decades. Mark Thompson, the director general of the BBC, said in 2010 that,"The organization did struggle then with impartiality". Over the years the BBC has been accused of having a bias against those on the center-right of politics, with Peter Osborne of the Daily Telegraph stating that the “BBC was an attack weapon of the narrow, arrogant left-liberal elite”.  Alasdair Pinkerton analyzed the coverage of India by the BBC from India's 1947 independence from British rule till 2008 and observed a tumultuous history involving allegations of anti-India bias in the BBC's reportage, and concluded that the "BBC's coverage of South Asian geopolitics and economics showed a pervasive and hostile anti-India bias because of the BBC's alleged imperialist and neocolonialist stance."

The Kashmir elections will not be as easy or smooth event for the Government of Bharat. Many anti-Bharat forces are putting in every effort to destabilize the democratic process and prevent the voters of Jammu & Kashmir from exercising their political will to form a government of their choice. Every effort must be made by every patriot to support our government in the preservation of democratic values and the safety of our constitution.

Jai Hind.  

 

 

 

 

Sins of the Vatican “Deciphering the Complexities of the Catholic Church”

 Introduction:

Throughout history, few institutions have wielded as much influence, power, and controversy as the Catholic Church and its spiritual epicenter, the Vatican. For centuries, the Church has been a central force in shaping the course of Western civilization, guiding the faithful, inspiring devotion, and embroiling itself in scandal and intrigue. In this comprehensive exploration, "Sins of the Vatican," we embark on a journey through the tumultuous history, enduring controversies, and evolving relevance of the Catholic Church and the Vatican in the modern world.

To understand the complexities of the Catholic Church and the Vatican, we must first delve into their origins and foundations. The roots of the Church trace back to the teachings of Jesus Christ and the formation of the early Christian community in the ancient Roman Empire. Over the centuries, Christianity spread throughout the Mediterranean world, evolving into a diverse and vibrant religious movement with its own doctrines, rituals, and institutions.

Central to the story of the Catholic Church is the office of the Pope, whose authority as the successor of Saint Peter is believed to derive directly from Jesus' commission to the apostle. From the humble beginnings of the papacy in the early centuries of Christianity to its emergence as a global spiritual authority, the papal office has played a pivotal role in shaping the beliefs, practices, and governance of the Church.

Yet, alongside its spiritual mission, the Catholic Church has grappled with controversies, scandals, and challenges throughout its history. From theological disputes and political conflicts to accusations of corruption and abuse, the Church has weathered storms that have tested its integrity and credibility. The Crusades, the Inquisition, the Reformation, and the sexual abuse scandal are but a few examples of the controversies that have left indelible black marks on the legacy of the Catholic church.

One of the most never-ending controversies surrounding the Catholic Church is its relationship with power and authority. Throughout the centuries, the Church has wielded significant influence over politics, culture, and society, often blurring the lines between spiritual and temporal realms. The Holy See, as the central governing body of the Church, has played a key role in shaping Church doctrine, administering sacraments, and mediating conflicts among the faithful.

Despite the challenges and controversies that it has faced, the Catholic Church and the Vatican remain influential and relevant institutions in the modern world. As the world's largest Christian denomination, with over a billion followers worldwide, the Church continues to provide spiritual guidance, moral leadership, and social services to millions of people. It also shields immoral priests accused of sexual exploitation of children and women, attempts to cover-up it’s financial scandals and the immorality of its continuous efforts to convert poor and impoverished people across the world into Christianity.

The Vatican serves as a global diplomatic entity, engaging with governments, international organizations, and religious communities to promote peace, justice, and human rights. Through its diplomatic missions, papal encyclicals, and humanitarian efforts, on the surface, the Vatican seeks to address pressing issues such as poverty, inequality, climate change, and religious persecution on the global stage.

Yet, the Church also confronts significant challenges in the modern era, including declining membership in Western countries, cultural shifts, and internal divisions over issues such as gender equality, sexuality, and the role of women in the Church. As it navigates the complexities of the 21st century, the Catholic Church faces the imperative of adapting to changing realities while remaining faithful to its core principles and teachings.

"Sins of the Vatican" is an exploration of the Catholic Church and the Vatican that seeks to illuminate the multifaceted dimensions of an institution that has shaped the course of history and continues to influence the lives of billions of people around the world. From its humble origins in the teachings of Jesus Christ to its global presence in the modern era, the Catholic Church and the Vatican stand as symbols of faith, tradition, and criminal controversies in the human story. Through this book, we endeavor to unravel the complexities, confront the challenges, and the enduring relevance of an institution that has existed over the last two thousand years. 

 NOTE: 

The above is the introductory chapter to my next book - "Sins of the Vatican", that is still being composed and hopefully will be ready for publishing by end July 2024.  

The changing landscape of terrorism and its funding.

 In the last two years (2023 / 2024) deaths from terrorism have increased by over 22% and are now at their highest levels since 2017, though they are 23% lower than their peak in 2015. While the number of deaths increased, the number of terrorists’ incidents fell, with total attacks dropping by 22% since 2017. While there were 3,350 global terrorist attacks in 2023, Pakistan recorded the highest in any country with 490 recorded attacks. The rising number of fatalities, with a reducing number of incidents indicates that terrorism is becoming more concentrated and correspondingly lethal. There were 57 countries affected by terrorism in 2015 and 44 in 2022, which fell to 41 in 2023. The single largest terrorist attack that occurred in 2023 was the 7^th October attack by Hamas on Israel, that killed 1,200 people and was the largest single terror attack since 11 September 2001 (the 9/11 attacks). The consequences of the Hamas attack are still in progress with an estimated 26,000 Palestinian killed by the retaliatory military response by Israel, as of February 2024.

While Israel suffered the largest terrorist attack of 2023, it was Burkina Faso that has been most impacted by terrorism. 258 terrorist attacks killed over 2,000 people, accounting for nearly a quarter of the global deaths due to terrorism, surpassing Afghanistan and Iraq. Iraq had less than 100 deaths from terrorism in 2023, a massive 99% reduction in the number of deaths since their peak in 2007, and incidents falling by 90%. Afghanistan has had an 84% fall in deaths and 75% reduction in incidents since 2007. The deadliest terrorists’ groups in 2023 were the Islamic State (Daesh), the Jamat Nusrat al-Islam wal Muslimeen (JNIM) which is part of the Algeria based al-Qaeda, Hamas, and al-Shabaab which is based in Somalia and active in East Africa.

The Islamic State has remained the globally deadliest terrorist group for the last nine consecutive years, recording the highest number of attacks and the greatest number of deaths from terrorism. The group is still active, although its impact has been falling these past nine years. Deaths attributed to this group and its affiliates fell by 17% over the last year, the lowest since 2014, while it carried out attacks in 20 countries in 2023, a number that is reduced from 30 countries in 2020. 

Terrorism has been reducing for several years prior to 2023 with a substantial fall between 2015 to 2019, with a current high percentage increase even as the total number of attacks have fallen considerably. The number of active terrorist groups have also fallen over the past 15 years with 66 still active in 2023, compared to 141 in 2009. However, terrorist attacks are now more intensified with fewer attacks committed by fewer people, while causing a higher number of fatalities, with the death of victims rising from 1.6 per attack in 2022 to 2.5 per attack in 2023. 

Today, the primary threat of terrorism comes from individuals inside the country who are inspired the global terrorist organizations ideologies and those who seek to martyr themselves by carrying out terrorist attacks without any specific directions from a known terrorist group. Particularly, domestic violent extremism, which is motivated by religious bias, grievances against government authority and/or a mix of ideologies have grown over the last five years to become one if the most serious threats against democracies.

As the nature of the threat of terrorism and the individuals involved get more varied, the financing of terrorist activities has similarly changed over the past few years. While some organizations still send money to terrorist groups across the world, many “inspired” individuals are focusing their efforts and resources on unprotected civilian targets. ISIS and al-Qaeda related financial activity is most commonly associated with people from the Western countries, USA, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and North African countries aspiring to travel and join these organizations, while transferring money via underground channels. 

Terrorist organizations are also fast adopting to changes in technology, using virtual assets to transfer funds, and using clones of legitimate charities to collect and transfer funds globally. ISIS-K in Afghanistan remains an important and powerful affiliate due to its role as a regional hub, transferring hundreds of thousands of dollars to financial facilitators as well as providing personnel and weapons to support external operations. Apart from cash reserves, ISIS generates significant income through various illicit and criminal activities. Kidnapping for ransom and extortion provides significant amounts of money to the group, especially for key ISIS branches, such as ISIS-K and ISIS-Somalia. 

ISIS-Somalia has become one of the most important branches for ISIS financially, as it generates significant revenue for the group through extortion of local businesses and financial institutions, some of which is then transferred and distributed to other ISIS branches and networks. ISIS-Somalia has served as a financial and communication hub for the global ISIS enterprise, facilitating funds transfers to other branches and networks through mobile money platforms, cash transfers, hawala, and money laundering through businesses. ISIS has also sought to aggressively fundraise online using social media, encrypted mobile applications, online gaming platforms, and virtual asset service providers (VASPs) for fund transfers.

Al-Qaeda and its affiliate groups continue to utilize many of their long-standing methods of illicit revenue generation. According to the UN, al-Shabaab is still in a very strong financial position, having several reliable sources of income, with an estimated annual revenue of around $100 million. The group engages in systemic extortion of businesses and individuals in Somalia, leveraging its territorial control to maintain a consistent stream of revenue. Tactics include setting up checkpoints to extort vehicles and transportation of goods along supply routes as well as illegally taxing residential properties and developers of new properties in Mogadishu. Al-Shabaab predominantly collects this money in cash but also uses mobile money services, money remitters, and banks to transfer funds. Recent public actions against al-Shabaab financiers have highlighted al-Shabaab’s reliance on weak government institutions and regional and international networks of financial facilitators to support the group’s activities.

The terrorist group Hizbullah is funded in large part by the Iranian government, which provides several hundred million dollars a year in direct funding. Hizbullah also engages in a range of illicit and commercial activities to supplement its income. These illicit activities range from oil smuggling and shipping and charcoal smuggling to drug and weapons trafficking. For instance, Hizbullah has been implicated in several complex illicit oil smuggling schemes which were orchestrated by, and jointly benefited, both Hizbullah and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Quds Force. In one scheme, numerous companies and ships smuggled Iranian oil by blending it with Indian petroleum-products and creating counterfeit certificates of origin. The oil was then loaded onto ships owned and flagged in Liberia and Djibouti, seen as more permissive jurisdictions, to avoid scrutiny. This example demonstrates Hizbullah’s ability to use a complex web of front companies to hide, both the ownership of the vessels and the true source of the oil. Hizbullah also regularly exploits the international financial system and excels in utilizing networks of seemingly legitimate front companies to raise, launder, and move money on behalf of the group. These front companies are used to obscure the true beneficial ownership. They are used extensively in various commercial activities benefiting Hizbullah, such as real estate, import/export, construction, and luxury goods. These commercial activities generate significant income for the group and draw less scrutiny than outright illicit enterprises.

Terrorism and terrorist financing threat has evolved significantly since 2017, with terrorist organizations and violent extremist movements having shifted to a more diffuse, less hierarchical, networked structure facilitated by online communication, in which individuals may self-radicalize and become inspired by an ideology from across the globe. In the financing context, this means attacks by such radicalized individuals are smaller scale and require less outside financing, creating significant challenges for financial institutions and law enforcement looking to prevent attacks. However, terrorist organizations will still look to battle-tested methods of raising, moving, and using funds. Even as new security challenges arise, and terrorists adapt to counter-terrorism efforts, and new terrorist threats emerge around the world, we have to remain committed to keep evolving to meet new challenges and countering the next decade of terrorist threats.

 

References:

1.   Global terrorism index [GTI]

2.   Terrorism tracker

3.   Institute for Economics and Peace

4.   U.S. Dept of Justice

5.   ODNI 2023 Annual Threat Assessment

6.   International Centre for Counter-Terrorism

7.   U.S. Department of Treasury, OFAC reports

8.   FATF, Terrorist Financing Risk Assessment Guidance, (Jul. 2019)

 

 

 

Taliban of the 21st century:

 The Taliban’s agility and ability to adapt has been remarkable. Their gradual acceptance to the fact that unrestricted violence would hurt their quest for popular support, transformed into sophisticated policy planning and implementation of developmental activities. Step-by-step, they revived and re-started parts of their governance, and invented other systems through trial and error. Much of this process appears to be from the ground-up and influenced by popular demand and local experiences. Their leadership also proceeded to correct many of the flaws and shortcomings that undermined their rule in the 1990s. The ban on women and girls attending school has been removed, though most Taliban officials claim that no ban ever existed, and have publicly stated that women should have access to education. The ban on opium cultivation and its trade, which was a disaster during their earlier government times is clearly no longer in place, but the Taliban do not publicize this shift in policy and down-play the opium connection in public. Other subtle differences are their stated respect for other ethnic groups and their embrace of technology, limited as it may be. Circumstances have radically changed for the Taliban since 2001, and their policies and goals have shifted accordingly. Far from being a revolutionary movement of the 1990s, prior to 2022, they considered themselves as a deposed government and the main armed opposition fighting the pro-Western government supported by foreign soldiers. The Taliban leadership itself has also been transformed. Circumstances have forced them to travel outside their villages and also outside the country at times, and they have learned from their travels.

The simple fighters of yester-years are worldly trained politicians today; transforming themselves from being traditional conservatives into modern Islamist's. They have also become better at managing external perceptions, having realized that appearing as educated people is an advantage and it is helpful in manipulating the media. They have become sophisticated; with professional-standard glossy publications, a website in several languages, videos made of high-quality production and highly capable spokesmen that respond rapidly to questions and criticism across social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook and WhatsApp; even though what is publicized on the social media is vastly different from the ground reality in Afghanistan. What exactly do the changes in Taliban policy means for Afghans and the future of Afghanistan will depend on the critical study and analysis of their on-ground actions. The Taliban are led by the Emir ul-Mumenin (leader of the faithful), currently Mullah Haibatullah Akhunzada. The scope and complexity of this position varies according to the person who occupies it, and the current Emir’s functions are more spiritual and political, than as an operational military commander. He is assisted by two deputies, as well as the leadership shura. At the provincial level there is a governor, appointed officially by the leadership shura. The Taliban now has a quasi–professional core of individuals who have served for several years across multiple provinces. These governors and local councils / commissions are not completely ‘civilian’, and the governors may serve in military capacity to varying degrees depending on the context and broader requirements of the office for local governance. Provincial ministers are appointed by the leadership of the relevant council, viz: education, health and finance; in consultation with the governor of the province. The system has grown more comprehensive over the years, with a dozen committees, some with multiple departments covering a multitude of issues. Significant autonomy is granted to province and district level officials within the overall framework of the policy.

This flexibility is intentional, in order to accommodate different views and reducing dissent to as little as possible. It also helps to prevent the Taliban from splitting into different factions; since local politics and preferences based on history play a significant role in governance. Some areas might have a higher demand for health services than others, while others might want to give priority to education. The extent to which services have been available in the past also matters.  Areas where customary structures of governance are influential and respected, are in a stronger position to bargain for amenities from the Taliban officials. Individual relationships also influence policies, although the Taliban does not generally welcome individual opinions, since such interactions could be perceived as corruption.  In practice however, the Taliban rely on relationships in every aspect of their governance, due to a lack of trust in general and the widespread suspicion of their motives by the locals and the international interlocutors. Arrangements between the Taliban and civilians are based on a mutual yet unequal exchange, leading to an informal social contract that renders to the Taliban a legitimate authority, and strengthening its credibility as an acceptable form of government; even though it is not a government based on the choice and free will of the people of Afghanistan.