USA creating a fuzzy narrative that borders on falsehood against India.

 Recently, I came across a video by one Jacob Templin, who supposedly is an adjunct professor at Columbia University and Head of Video at Thomson Reuters from New York. His video was titled, “We don’t know how many people live in India, and it’s a problem”.

 The question to ask is, why is a leftist liberal like Jacob Templin interested in social issues of a foreign country? He neither stays in India, nor pays taxes here; and any views or opinions that he might have in this context are immaterial and unwarranted. Yet, these leftists keep on harping on issues in foreign countries, since its their very nature to try and pull-down others to their gutter levels.

 The USA as a nation is not known for its social integration. It’s a nation that has a history of slavery of colored people by white people, and a bloodier history of acquiring land through the mass massacre of native Indian tribes, and through war with neighboring governments to annex their territory. From the north-east where the first English people landed, to the Western shores of USA, their primary strategy of land-grab was through violence, blood-shed and genocide. Make no mistake about it, USA has committed genocide across continents and over decades to assert their ‘superiority’ over others.

 But, coming to the specific video that is the center of this article, its rather comical that the “victim” that is portrayed in the video is overweight to the point of being obese and even her family members who are seen in the background are, to put it mildly, overweight. The two Indian lady narrators in the video are, as usual, representing the bleeding-hearts that you stumble across in various social gatherings in India, and who justify their existence in society by living off the scraps thrown at them by the illiterate liberals of the western world.

 Indians have food security. The ‘victim’ in the video complains that she is buying flour from the stores in India at the price of ₹ 35/- per kilo (approximately 0.43 US cents for 2.2 US Lbs). Compare this to the March 2023 wheat flour retail price in USA at 0.52 cents per pound, or approximately 20% more expensive in USA as compared to India.

 Templin also seems to be totally unconcerned and oblivious to the fact that 9 million children in USA face hunger daily and do not know where they will find their next meal. This is according to the NGO in USA called Feeding America. Templin should also take note of the fact that off the 1-in-8 kids that are at risk of hunger in his country; black and Latino kids are more likely to face hunger than white children due to the systematic racial injustice in his country, USA.

In comparison, during the Covid lock-down in India, the government of India, under the leadership of Prime Minister Modi, distributed food at subsidized rates to over 80 million residents of India; without any discrimination, giving 35 kg of food grain every month to families at the cost of 1 Indian rupees ($0.0121) to 3 Indian rupees ($0.0362). This free food program was terminated after the Covid pandemic’s dangers receded. As of today (in 2023), the Food Corporation of India through foresight and planning of an efficient supply chain management, growth in food production, and customer affordability due to subsidized prices for consumers, price support for farmers and food availability through extra grain distribution; have substantially reduced the number of food–insecure people in India. Due to this forward planning by our Prime Minister Modi’s government, the number of food-insecure people in India is projected to decrease to 24.7 million or 1.7 percent, by the next decade.

In the video, there is talk about growing unemployment and inflation in my India. The blatant lies here are not only mischievous but dangerously anti-Indian.

According to the recent (March 2023) report by CMIE (Centro for Monitoring Indian Economy), India’s unemployment rate in India is around 7.45% at present. Compare this to the unemployment rate in USA which stands at an average of 4.7% nationally, which is on the higher side for a ‘developed industrial’ nation.

The current inflation rate in India is 6.16% on average, which is calculated based on CPI (Consumer Price Index) values for the last 12 months ending in January 2023 while that of USA is 6.04% on average (down from 9.06% in June 2022). [Reference Inflationdata (dot) com].

The one issue that Templin and his ilk will never have an opinion on is the gun-violence in USA. According to ABC (American Broadcasting Company) News, more than 9,800 people were killed by gun violence in USA in the first 90 days of this year. That is 108 people killed per day. So, Templin is worried about the people problems in India, but has no published opinion about the people problem in his own country? 

Essentially, a country of 1.3 billion people with a rising economy cannot be the problem of Americans in any manner. But the liberal leftists like Templin consider every democracy, including their own as a danger to society, and therein lies the root cause of all intellectual insurgency.

Let Jacob Templin and others like him know, that our India is on a path to success under the able leadership of our Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and leftist liberals like him are not going to stop our success.

 

 

 

The Rise and Rise of Ai ...

 Artificial intelligence (Ai) is already making a significant impact on our lives and professions, and its influence is only going to grow stronger in the coming times. While Ai has the potential to bring about numerous benefits, it also poses several challenges that we need to be aware of.

In this article, we will discuss some of the challenges that arise from Ai influencing our lifestyles and professions, with a focus on how job profiles will change and which jobs will be affected the most.

1.    Automation of jobs

This is one of the most significant challenges posed by Ai. As Ai becomes more advanced, it is increasingly able to perform tasks that were once the exclusive domain of humans. This includes everything from manual labor to complex decision-making processes. As a result, many jobs that were previously done by humans are now being automated, leading to job loss and displacement.

Jobs that are most at risk of Ai automation include those that involve repetitive tasks or those that require little creativity or problem-solving. This includes jobs in manufacturing, data entry, and customer service. Even jobs that involve higher-level thinking, such as accountancy and law, are not immune to automation. Already, some Ai systems are already being used to help lawyers and accountants perform their work more efficiently.

2.    New job requirements

While some jobs may be automated, others will require new skills and knowledge to keep up with the changing landscape of Ai. Data scientists and engineers will be needed to design and develop Ai systems, while others will be needed to train and manage these systems. Additionally, jobs that involve creativity and critical thinking, such as artists and writers, may become more important as Ai takes over more routine tasks. Workers will need to adapt to new job requirements, which may involve retraining and up-skilling. This presents a challenge for both workers and employers, as they will need to invest time and resources to stay ahead of the changes brought about by Ai.

3.    Bias and fairness

Ai systems are only as unbiased as the data they are trained on. If the data used to train an Ai system is biased, the system will also be biased. This can lead to unfair outcomes and perpetuate existing inequalities. For example, if an Ai system used to screen job applications is trained on data that is biased against certain groups, it may lead to discrimination against those groups.

To address this challenge, it is essential to ensure that Ai systems are trained on unbiased data and are regularly audited to ensure fairness. Since, there is a need for diversity and inclusion in the development of Ai systems, it is necessary to ensure that the perspectives of all groups are taken into account.

4.    Privacy and security issues

Ai systems rely on large amounts of data to function effectively. This data often includes sensitive personal information, such as health records and financial data, thereby posing a significant risk of privacy breaches and data theft.

To address this challenge, it is essential to implement robust privacy and security measures. This includes ensuring that data is stored securely and that only authorized personnel have access to it. Additionally, it is essential to ensure that Ai systems are designed with privacy and security in mind, to minimize the risk of data breaches.

5.    Ethical concerns

Ai systems raise a range of ethical concerns, including issues related to accountability, transparency, and control. Essentially, who is to be held responsible if an Ai system makes a mistake that leads to harm to individuals? How can it be ensured that Ai systems are transparent and explainable, so that we can understand how they make decisions? And how can we ensure that humans retain control over Ai systems, rather than the other way around?

To address these concerns, it is essential to develop ethical frameworks and guidelines for the development and deployment of Ai systems. This includes ensuring that Ai systems are transparent and explainable, so that their decision-making processes can be understood and audited. It also involves creating mechanisms for accountability, so that individuals and organizations can be held responsible for the outcomes of A systems.

6.    Social and cultural impacts

We have to consider that the widespread adoption of Ai is likely to have significant social and cultural impacts. It is expected that the use of Ai systems to automate jobs may lead to significant economic and social upheaval, particularly in developing countries where many people rely on low-skilled jobs. Additionally, the increasing reliance on Ai systems in decision-making may have unintended consequences, such as perpetuating existing biases and inequalities.

To address these concerns, it is essential to ensure that the benefits of Ai are shared equally across all sections of society. This includes ensuring that workers who are displaced by Ai are given the support they need to retrain and find new employment. It also involves taking into account the potential social and cultural impacts of Ai systems, and designing a strategy to mitigate any negative effects.

In terms of job profiles that will be most affected by Ai, it is likely that low-skilled jobs that involve repetitive tasks will be the most at risk of automation. This includes jobs such as manufacturing, data entry, and customer service. And, as Ai systems become more advanced, it will impact higher-level jobs, such as those in law and accounting, which will also be affected.

However, there are new job profiles emerging as a result of Ai being used in our daily lives. For example, data scientists, engineers, and analysts are in high demand to design and develop Ai systems. And, jobs that require creativity and problem-solving, such as artists and writers, will become even more important as Ai systems take over more routine and repetitive tasks (except brushing your own teeth).

Therefore, while the impact of Ai on our lifestyles and professions is still unfolding, it is clear that it poses both challenges and opportunities. As we move forward, it is essential to answer these challenges proactively and work towards a future where Ai is used to benefit society as a whole and the individual in particular. This involves developing ethical frameworks for the development and deployment of Ai systems, ensuring that the benefits of Ai are shared equitably across society, and investing in retraining and upskilling programs to help workers adapt to the changing job landscape.

Thus, it is important that we do not fear Ai, but work towards having control over its development, so that it can be used for our benefit. 

 

 

 

 

 

Ask what you can do for our country Bharat....

 As Bharat (also know as India) grows in leaps and bounds; economically, socially and internationally, we the citizens have to ask an important question on how we can contribute towards this growth through sweat equity, skill development and creating an environment for uplifting society as a whole.

Firstly, let's begin with the concept of sweat equity. Sweat equity refers to the value that an individual adds to a project through their hard work, effort and time. Citizens can contribute to the growth by actively participating in activities that generate value for their community or country. For example, citizens can volunteer their time to work on public infrastructure projects such as building schools, hospitals or roads. They can also participate in community service activities such as cleaning up their neighborhood, helping to plant trees or organizing events to bring people together. These activities not only generate value for the community but also provide opportunities for citizens to develop new skills and expertise that can benefit them and the economy in the long run, while promoting social interaction between communities.

Secondly, skill development is an essential aspect of contributing towards the growth of the economy. Citizens can contribute by acquiring new skills and knowledge that are in demand in the market. They can do this by taking up courses and training programs that help them develop the necessary skills and knowledge to be competitive in the job market. This can include learning new technologies, programming languages, or specialized skills such as marketing, project management, or financial management. By developing their skills and expertise, citizens can increase their own productivity, create knowledge banks with others in the same fields, promote civil unity and contribute to the growth of the economy.

Finally, creating an environment for uplifting society as a whole is an essential aspect of contributing towards the growth of the economy. Citizens can create a positive and inclusive environment that encourages innovation, entrepreneurship, and growth. This can include supporting small businesses and start-ups by buying locally made products, investing in new businesses or providing mentorship to aspiring entrepreneurs. Citizens can also support education and research by donating to universities, supporting scholarships, or volunteering to mentor students. By creating an environment that supports growth, citizens can contribute to the growth of the economy and uplift society as a whole.

Just by this approach, citizens of our country can contribute towards a stronger economic growth through sweat equity, skill development, and creating an environment for uplifting society as a whole. By actively participating in community service activities, acquiring new skills and knowledge, and creating a positive and inclusive environment, citizens can increase their productivity and contribute to the growth of the economy. This, in turn, can create a positive cycle of growth, development, and prosperity for the entire country as a whole.

 

 

 

 

Biased, Poorly managed and Untrustworthy - The London Police

Being in the middle of a controversy is nothing new for The London Metropolitan Police, commonly known as the Metropolitan Police Service or simply the Met, which is the largest police force in the United Kingdom.

It is responsible for policing the 32 boroughs of London, covering an area of 620 square miles and in current times, serving a population of more than 8 million people. The Met has a long and controversial history, spanning more than 180 years.

The Met was founded in 1829 by Sir Robert Peel, the Home Secretary at that time. At the time, London had no organized police force, and law enforcement was the responsibility of parish (local community) constables and watchmen. This system was highly inefficient, and crime rates in the city were high. Peel's vision was to create a professional police force that would be accountable to the public and would uphold the law impartially. Peel’s principle was the goal to preventing crime, not catching criminals. According to him, if the police stop crime before it happens, they (the government) will not have to punish citizens or suppress their rights. His opinion was that “an effective police department doesn’t have high arrest statistics; and its community has low crime rates”.

The first 1,000 police officers were known as "Peelers" or "Bobbies," after their founder. They were selected for their physical fitness and moral character and were trained in basic police work, such as crowd control, investigation, and arrest procedures. The Met's headquarters were established at Scotland Yard, and its officers were issued with uniforms and truncheons (a short thick club).

Initially, the Met was not well received by the public. Many Londoners saw the police as an intrusive and oppressive force, and there were several riots in the early years of the Met's existence. However, over time, the police gained public trust, and crime rates began to decline. By the mid-19th century, the Met had become a model for police forces around the world.

The Met was not always the model police agency for efficiency or competence. In the 1860s and 1870s it was tasked with investigating a series of bombings known as the ‘Fenian bombings’, carried out by Irish republican groups. The Met’s handling of these cases was criticized for being heavy-handed and discriminatory towards Irish communities.

The Met's first significant controversy occurred in 1888, with the White-chapel murders, which are more commonly known as the ‘Jack the Ripper’ killings. The Met's investigation of the murders was heavily criticized for its incompetence and lack of progress, maybe because the police considered the five women victims to be prostitutes (which was debatable even in those days), and the killer was never identified or caught, with the case remaining unsolved to this day.

The Met's next major controversy came in 1911, with the Siege of Sidney Street. A group of anarchists had taken refuge in a house in East London, after initially killing two police officers and a third one when the police had surrounded the building. The police response was heavily criticized for its lack of planning and coordination, and questions were raised about the use of antiquated firearms by the police. The police, through the then Home Secretary, Winston Churchill, had to request the assistance of the British Army to quell the situation and bring it under control.

During the 20th century, the Met faced several other controversies, including the policing of protests and riots.

In the early 20th century, the Met was involved in the policing of the Suffragette movement, which campaigned for women's right to vote. When the then British Prime Minister Asquith reneged on his commitment to present ‘The Conciliation Bill’, that would have allowed women, the Right-to-Vote; the women protestors who marched to towards their Parliament were met with brutal force from the Met police, which resulted in the death of two women at the hands of the police.

The Met's most significant controversy in recent times came in 1993 with the murder of Stephen Lawrence. Lawrence was a black British teenager who was murdered in a racist attack by four white youths in South London. The police investigation into Lawrence's murder was heavily criticized for its incompetence, and allegations of racism within the police force led to a public inquiry. Sir William Macpherson, a retired high court judge and former soldier, headed this inquiry and concluded that the investigation into the killing had been “marred by a combination of professional incompetence, institutional racism and a failure of leadership”. Specific officers in the Metropolitan police were named and the entire force was criticized. The inquiry led to a series of reforms within the Met, including changes to the way the police investigate hate crimes and a greater focus on diversity and inclusion within the force.

In 2021, Sarah Everard was kidnapped and murdered in London, by a London Met Police officer, Wayne Couzens. On 9 March 2021, Couzens was arrested for her kidnapping and murder. However, it was during the vigil of of 13 March on Clapham Common, that led to a controversial police response and four arrests for breaches of COVID-19 regulations, which was criticized for its heavy-handedness and lack of sensitivity towards women's safety concerns. An investigation by Louise Casey, a member of the British parliament's upper house who led the review, said "radical" reform was needed after severe failings were found across the Met, which employs more than 43,000 officers and staff.

"We have found widespread bullying, discrimination, institutional homophobia, misogyny and racism," the report said, adding "women and children do not get the protection and support they deserve".

London’s police force has lost the confidence of the people it serves because it is riven with institutional racism, misogyny and homophobia and doesn’t do enough to weed out bad officers, according to this withering report commissioned after Sarah Everard was raped and killed by a serving officer.

Deep-seated bias, poor management and budget cuts mean that crimes against women and girls are poorly investigated, ethnic minority communities are over-policed and trust in the police is plummeting among various sections of the people, the report found. These issues have been allowed to fester because whistle-blowers are ostracized, outside criticism is ignored and too many bad officers have been allowed to remain on the job, even after they’ve been charged with domestic abuse or harassing their colleagues.

Despite its many controversies, the Met has also been at the forefront of many significant developments in policing, including the introduction of fingerprinting and DNA analysis in criminal investigations. It has played a significant role in counter-terrorism operations, particularly following the terrorist attacks in London in 2005, which claimed the lives of 52 people and injured hundreds more. The Met's response to the attacks was praised for its effectiveness, but there were also concerns about civil liberties and the use of anti-terrorism legislation.

The Met has responded to these controversies by acknowledging its shortcomings and committing to reforms. In the wake of the Stephen Lawrence inquiry, the Met introduced a range of measures aimed at improving diversity and reducing racism within the force. These included the higher recruitment of black and minority ethnic officers, the implementation of unconscious bias training, and the establishment of a diversity and inclusion unit.

The Met has also made efforts to improve its community engagement and build trust with the public. The force has introduced neighborhood policing teams, which work closely with local communities to address local concerns and build relationships and has embraced social media and other forms of digital communication to improve transparency and engage with a wider audience.

Despite these efforts, the Met continues to face criticism and controversy. The force is often at the center of debates about police powers, accountability, and civil liberties. The ongoing debate about the role of the police in society and the relationship between law enforcement and the public is likely to continue for many years to come.

 

 

Influence Engineering in Politics

Influence engineers are individuals or organizations that specialize in using various tactics to shape the opinions, beliefs, and behaviours of other people and societies, often through the use of technology and data-driven technologies. In the political and diplomatic sphere, influence engineering can have significant impacts on election outcomes, public opinion, and international relations.

One of the key tactics used by influence engineers in politics is social media manipulation. This involves using bots, fake accounts, and targeted advertising to spread propaganda, disinformation, and other types of messaging to specific audiences. For example, in one of the published controversies during the 2016 US presidential election, it was alleged that Russian operatives used social media manipulation to disseminate false information and sow discord among American voters.

Another tactic used by influence engineers in politics is micro-targeting. This involves using data analytics to identify specific groups of voters and create highly targeted messaging that appeals to their interests and concerns. Micro-targeting can be highly effective in mobilizing voters and swaying public opinion, as it allows political campaigns to tailor their messages to specific audiences and appeal to their emotions and values.

Influence engineering can also play a role in international diplomacy, where the use of soft power can be a powerful tool in shaping the opinions and behaviors of other nations. Soft power refers to the ability to influence others through cultural and ideological means, rather than through military or economic coercion. In the context of international diplomacy, soft power can be used to build alliances, promote democracy and human rights, and foster economic and social development.

One example of influence engineering in international diplomacy is public diplomacy, which involves using various communication and cultural exchange programs to promote a nation's image and values abroad.

In Europe, the use of nudging techniques to promote environmentally-friendly behavior, encourages people to make decisions that are in their best interest. Several governments have used ‘nudging techniques’ to promote sustainable behaviors, such as reducing energy consumption, promoting recycling, and encouraging the use of public transportation.

In the Netherlands, the government used a ‘nudge’ to reduce littering in train stations by painting images of flies on urinals, which reduced "spillage" by 80 percent. In the UK, the government launched a campaign called "Love Food Hate Waste" which used nudges to encourage people to reduce food waste by providing information on how to store food properly, and promoting the use of smaller plates to encourage smaller portion sizes.

Asian countries use gamification is a form of influence engineering. It involves using game-like elements such as points, badges, and leader boards to motivate people to engage in a desired behavior. Several organizations have used gamification to promote healthy life styles promoting exercise, healthy eating, and getting enough sleep.

Japan launched a campaign called "Metabo Watch" which used a gamified app to encourage people to exercise and maintain a healthy weight. The app allowed users to track their daily steps and compete with friends to reach fitness goals. Similarly, in Singapore, the Health Promotion Board launched an app called "Healthy 365" which encourages people to eat more fruits and vegetables, drink adequate amounts of water, and get enough sleep.

 However, it's worth noting that influence engineering in politics and international diplomacy is not without controversy. Critics argue that these tactics can be used to undermine democracy and manipulate public opinion, and that they often rely on unethical or even illegal means to achieve their goals.

One negative example of influence engineering is the Cambridge Analytica Scandal, where in 2018, it was revealed that the political consulting firm, Cambridge Analytica, had harvested the personal data of millions of Facebook users without their consent to create targeted political advertisements during the 2016 US Presidential Election. The scandal revealed how the firm had used sophisticated influence engineering techniques to manipulate voters' perceptions and thought processes through targeted messaging.

The Chinese government developed a social credit system that uses a range of data sources, including online activity, to rate citizens' trustworthiness and compliance with social norms. This system incentivizes citizens to conform to desired social behavior and punishes those who deviate from them.

As such, it's important for individuals and organizations to be aware of the risks and limitations of influence engineering, and to use these tactics responsibly and ethically.

 

 

 

 

Rationale and Logic in Politics - what's the difference?

In politics, the terms "rationale" and "logic" are often used interchangeably, but they have distinct meanings. Rationale refers to the underlying reasons or justifications for a particular action or policy, while logic refers to the systematic and rational way of reasoning used to arrive at a conclusion or decision. In this article, we will explore the differences between these two concepts and provide two examples to illustrate their use in politics.

In politics, rationale often involves an assessment of the benefits and costs associated with a particular policy. This assessment can be based on a range of factors, including economic, social, political, and ethical considerations.

For example, the rationale for implementing a carbon tax may be based on the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate the impact of climate change. Proponents of the carbon tax may argue that it will provide an incentive for individuals and businesses to reduce their carbon footprint, leading to a decrease in emissions and an improvement in environmental outcomes. The costs associated with the tax, such as higher prices for energy and goods, may be seen as a necessary sacrifice to achieve this goal.

Another example of rationale in politics is the justification for military intervention. The rationale for military intervention may be based on the need to protect national security or to promote democracy and human rights. Supporters of military intervention may argue that it is necessary to prevent a humanitarian crisis or to stop the spread of terrorism. The costs associated with military intervention, such as the loss of life and the financial burden, may be seen as a necessary sacrifice to achieve these goals.

Logic in politics refers to the systematic and rational way of reasoning used to arrive at a conclusion or decision. In politics, logic often involves a careful analysis of the evidence and a consideration of the possible outcomes of different policies.

For example, the logic of trade policy may involve an assessment of the benefits and costs of free trade versus protectionism. Proponents of free trade may argue that it promotes economic growth and leads to lower prices for consumers, while opponents of free trade may argue that it leads to job losses and inequality. The logic of trade policy involves weighing these different factors and determining the best course of action based on the available evidence.

Another example of logic in politics is the use of cost-benefit analysis. Cost-benefit analysis involves weighing the costs and benefits of a particular policy or decision to determine its overall value. For example, cost-benefit analysis may be used to assess the economic impact of a new infrastructure project or to determine the most effective way to allocate government resources. The logic of cost-benefit analysis involves a systematic and rational approach to decision-making that is based on empirical evidence and quantitative analysis.

Overall, the difference between rationale and logic in politics lies in their focus. Rationale refers to the underlying reasons or justifications for a particular policy or action, while logic refers to the systematic and rational way of reasoning used to arrive at a conclusion or decision. Both concepts are important in politics, as they help policymakers and citizens to make informed decisions based on evidence and analysis.

Understanding the differences between these concepts can help to clarify political debates and facilitate more effective decision-making.