Monday, October 31, 2016

To War……To War……To War with Pakistan…….



Uri – 18th September 2016 – Pakistan sponsored terrorists attack on the Indian Army Brigade HQ killed 18 soldiers. The four terrorists of Jaish-e-Mohammed were exterminated at site.

This specific attack can be considered as the ‘straw that breaks the camel’s back’. The time has now come to attack Pakistan and destroy it as it stands today.

But, hold on. What does this exactly mean?

In the conventional warfare of olden times, this would have meant a cross-border attack using our tanks and infantry regiments while the air-force pounded strategic targets to rubble and the Navy attacked the Pakistani ports of Karachi and Gwadar.

But, we live in modern times. War is no longer a lateral activity where winners are decided by the amount of land that can be captured from the loser or the extent of damage that can be caused to the enemy’s infrastructure. It is no longer, even; the issue of capturing your enemy’s treasury or saleable assets. America has tried this in Iraq since 2003 and 13 years later is still failing miserably to control their ‘captured’ territory.

War between India and Pakistan today will cause ripples across surrounding nations and countries and impact the economics of almost every nation, near and far.
Does that mean that India should keep quiet, remain spineless and suffer the continuous humiliation from Pakistan? The answer is no; specifically an emphatic NO!

Remember our ancestor Chanakya? In war he used the quadruple tactics of ‘Saam, Daam, Danda, Bhed” (Saam = Strategy, Daam = Money power / Bribe, Danda = Force and Bhed = Cunning / Duplicity). And that has to be the basis of India’s next war against Pakistan.

The objective should be to over-run that country and remove its Islamic politics from the roots, while totally destroying its Armed Forces Command Structure (Not the rank-and-file, just the Generals) and to bring in a non-religious, non-sectarian democratic system of administration. Basically once Indian forces, accompanied by our Civil Administration enters and captures Pakistani territory we have to be prepared to stay there for at least 70 – 100 years, i.e. Three to five generations of citizens, to teach them democracy and imbibe in them the spirit of freedom and respect for other people and their opinions. 

Why? Because the population of Pakistan that will be brought under Indian administration will not happily submit to being ruled by those who they will consider as foreigners and invaders, and will consistently revolt and fight back with armed guerrilla tactics.  Just like in Iraq, Indian soldiers and support staff inside Pakistan will constantly be in danger and will suffer casualties.

So, how do we achieve all this?

Indian will have to use the 4D doctrine of “Defend, Deny, Diminish and Defeat”.

1st:   Defend our assets: The Indian Government will have to go into a war-mode and strictly enforce the laws of Indian all over the Nation, but emphatically and strictly in the Border States; to reduce anti-national activities, stop the activities of traitors within India and ensure that there is a rise in public confidence and awareness towards India’s defense strategy. Since law-enforcement will happen in the public domain, there is no issue of leakage of secret plans or strategies.

2nd:   DenyPakistan any lee-way to get funding or financial assistance from foreign countries. Pakistan’s financial well-being is dependent on the billions of dollars that it receives as Aid from America, Saudi-Arabia, and Qatar and the financial and military aid that it receives from China. Saudi and Qatar can be brought to heel by a simple commitment by India to their respective governments, that when war starts and India invades Pakistan; any assistance to Pakistan prior to the conflict or during conflict will be considered as assistance to the enemy and Indian nuclear missiles will most definitely reach Riyadh, Doha and other assets of these two States. Since USA has its largest air-force base outside of continental USA in Doha, any attack on Doha will definitely be an attack on USA; and thus USA will become part of the war, unless they mediate and force these two Arab countries to stop financial aid to Pakistan.

With USA and Canada, along-with NATO countries; there will have to be a broad and intensive diplomatic effort to convey the message of a forth-coming holocaust if Pakistan is not invaded, captured, and subdued. These diplomatic efforts would be focused on the populations of these countries using the support of the Indian Diaspora already settled there. Since Pakistan trained terrorist have already carried out attacks in Western countries and the population there is already suffering from these attacks; convincing the people of these countries to pressurize their representatives in the Senate(s) or Parliament(s) would not be an impossible task. We can and should ask the assistance of Israel in this war against Pakistan since Israel has always been grimly concerned about Pakistan’s Islamic Nuclear arsenal and would love the opportunity to neutralize this threat once-and-for-all. India should also ensure the cooperation and diplomatic support of Russia to keep USA and NATO in check and prevent them from undertaking any adventurous initiatives. 
 
China can be controlled by imposing a total ban on the import and distribution of Chinese manufactured goods inside India. Yes, many Indians will smuggle Chinese material to make a quick profit; but this can be controlled by harsh legal punishment and government enforced destruction of Chinese made goods and products. The denial of a huge market will ensure that China thinks twice about supporting Pakistan any further in its war against India.

3rd:   Diminish – the emotional value of Pakistan sponsored terrorist operations by using Psych-Ops (Psychological warfare) against the Jihadis. The terrorists are afraid of two issues after they are killed committing Jihad. One is the fear of their dead bodies being cremated and the other is the fear of their dead bodies being buried with pigs. While a non-jihadi person may consider these two issues as mundane and not worth the thought; for the Jihadi, it is crucial that his physical body after death remains pure and in one-piece. This is not usually the case after they have been shot dead or they commit suicide with explosives; but they are brain-washed to such an extent by the mullahs that they refuse to accept realistic logic in their blinkered minds. Psych-Ops, if used diligently and surgically will diminish the availability of future jihadis into the ranks of the terrorist organizations that are funded and guided by Pakistan.

Further to this, India must take a bold stand and issue financial bounty(s) on the heads of terrorist organizations and those mullahs in Pakistan who preach Jihad. While Pakistani mafia and other criminals who are capable of such extra-judicial executions don’t trust America or its allies; India still holds enough credibility to be trusted by these elements. This will lead to an internal crime war in Pakistan, further eroding the hold that the Pakistani Generals have on the population there.

4th:   Defeat – the multiple enemies that we will face in any war against Pakistan. These enemies are the Generals of the Pakistani Armed Forces, the various terrorist and Jihadi organizations, the mullahs who preach Jihad, the Separatist in Kashmir, their supporters amongst the Indians (CPI, CPIM, Presstitutes, self-declared intelligentsia, and others of their breed). The government and the people of India both know, who these people are and they need to be legally and socially pressurized to ensure their loyalty towards our Nation. Some of our enemies can be subdued using legal tactics and social pressure, but the terrorists will have to be exterminated and the Generals of Pakistan will have to stand trial in a court-of-law for their activities against humanity and for extreme violation of human rights. From Baluchistan to Kashmir to India, there is plenty of evidence over many years that can be used to literally hang the guilty on the hangman’s noose.

Two other issues that seem to be on everyone’s mind are; (a) Use of Nuclear Weapons by Pakistan against India, (b) the so-called China – Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

On the first issue, the chances of use of Nuclear weapons by the Pakistani Generals or the Political establishment are slim to none. This is because the Generals and the Politicians have pocketed humongous amounts of money that they have been receiving over the last few decades and have built up assets in various countries like UAE, Saudi Arabia, UK, Canada, USA, Australia and Europe. They are not going to allow their lifestyle of expensive Scotch, multiple-mistresses and global business enterprises be reduced to ashes. More than the Generals, it’s their legal and bastard off-springs who will prevent any such holocaust from taking place. The other pressure on the Generals to desist on the use of nuclear weapons will come from the Gulf countries and USA, because the mere thought of nuclear missiles hitting their oil-fields and natural-gas reservoirs and turning Arabic countries into large burning infernos and ruining the oil- based economies of USA and Europe will put the fear of the life and death into their rulers and leaders. Everybody is well aware of one reality – a nuclear war is a Zero sum game where everybody loses and nobody wins.

On the second issue of CPEC, articles have been sprouting over the internet that China will attack India over their estimated 50 billion dollar investment in the CPEC project and how it will try to defend its influence in the Indian-Asian part of our continent and Africa. These reports are pure bull-crap and seem to the fantasies of communist supporters. China has never gone to war over an economic issue since the end of the Second World War and the Chinese; who are masters of creating and controlling economic structures globally, will definitely not attack India on this small issue of CPEC. All that India has to do is sign an internationally ratified treaty with China that once India captures and controls Pakistani assets, they will allow China the full economic benefits of CPEC; which India will also use to its own benefits.

To put this all in a nutshell, war with Pakistan is inevitable. It will happen; when circumstances are created to ensure that we will win this war comprehensively and effectively; adding their territory to our own country. The specifics of the battle are best left to our military leadership who are amongst the best in the world. But it will be the politics and statesmanship before, during and after the war that will decide whether it will be a turning point towards our place in history and global society or just another debacle that will cost lives, and economic upheavals.

In conclusion; this war will not be without consequences to us as a community. There will be flight of capital out of the country and foreign investments will cease. We can expect Pakistani missiles to strike at least a few targets in India; which means that normal life as we know it will be affected. Railways will be used on priority by the Armed forces, thus civilian travel will be restricted. Day-to-day laborers and daily-wage earners will suffer, as will the salaried class. Recession will become a part of our economy for at least a couple of years. We will have disrupted power (electric) supply, fresh water will be hard to obtain, and prices of food items with rocket up as demand outstrips supply. Apart from this, we will lose many of our brave-hearts in battle. We, as a community; will have to ensure the rehabilitation of their families, the education for their children, the good health of their elderly and the spiritual and emotional well-being of their near and dear ones. Are we ready and willing to make the sacrifices that war will demand of our civilian population?

Jai Hind. Bharatmata Ki Jai.

Article by: ‘Sardar’ Sanjay Matkar
Twitter: @sanjaymatkar

Note: This article was earlier published in www.newsnviews.online   
I thank them for their support. 








Retired Generals need to “Stay Retired”.


Recently, I have been astounded by the activities on social media by retired senior officials of the Armed Forces, especially former Generals of the Army.



The two issues that seem to have ruffled their feathers are the implementation methodology of OROP (one rank one pension) and Rank Parity of military officers in comparison to the civilian bureaucrats in the Ministry of Defense.

OROP by itself has been implemented by Shri. Narendra Modi’s government. Its implementation may not appeal to all the officers across the spectrum of military thought; but that does not justify the campaign to vilify the serving Prime Minister of the Republic of India.

On the issue of rank parity of military officers, many retired officers of Flag-rank have taken to the social media to express themselves. While it is their right to freely express their opinions on any medium and on any topic; they seem to have lost sight of quite a few values in their enthusiasm to express themselves. 

The fact that these officers are upset about the rank parity issues does not in any way allow them the lee-way to insult the serving Defense Minister of our country. They forget that he is a graduate Engineer from IIT, a respected former Chief Minister of a State and known to be a technocrat. In a nutshell, he is nobody’s fool and can be depended upon to resolve issues in a permanent fashion.

The Prime Minister of India has gained the respect of the Nation as well as the respect of people from other nations. And he has done so under extremely trying circumstances, something that these officers can identify with after having enjoyed career postings in some of the harshest terrain of the world.

As a civilian who has no connection to the armed forces but respect them from heart and soul, I have a few choice words for these retired Generals:

1)    You have reached Flag-rank positions in your career because you have the intelligence and capabilities to be better than thousands of other officers who retired as time-scale Lieutenant Colonels. Retirement from service should not mean that you have retired your sense of propriety or good manners.

2)    When you were in service; you guided, trained and mentored your then juniors in almost every aspect of military service and its interaction with the civilian bureaucracy. Have confidence that you have instilled in them the correct values and acknowledge that these officers, who are now occupying your former positions in service, will do what is necessary and correct, to ensure that the civilian bureaucracy adheres to the laws of our Nation and the policies thereof.

3)    If you have an opinion or advice to the Prime Minister and / or the Defense Minister, do contact them directly and express your opinion to them as “Officers and Gentlemen”. 
I am sure that despite your publicly unwanted and rather bad-mannered rebukes through social media; both of them will receive you with full respect to your rank. I dare say that while they may not be officers in the armed forces, they will act like the gentlemen that they are. (Something that you may want to think about).

4)    Lastly, you have been appointed to flag-rank in your careers by representatives of a democratic government that represents the People of our Great Country. While you may not be required to personally like the serving ministers; both the military code of conduct and basic good manners require you to respect the office, if not the person holding the office.

Remember gentlemen. The people of India respect you for your service to the Nation as well as for your abilities and capabilities to rise to the ranks of leadership in the armed forces. Your inglorious behavior on social media or on any other public forum not only demeans you personally in our view; but also demeans the rank and office that you once distinguished.

One important point: Not all retired army officers indulge in irresponsible behavior on the social media. Many express themselves with wit and intellect. Their articles and expressed views give reason for serious thought on various topics and are considered carefully by those in positions of administrative power. But then, none of these responsible officers who are thorough gentlemen, have a daughter whose political career needs to be kick-started again and again after umpteen failures; or have a group of retired officers supporting this activity due to friendship or sheer loyalty.

And, to all those who served distinguished careers as Short Service Commission officers - You deserve our respect and our loyalty, because you went forth on an adventure for a few years that many of us civilians wish for, but never achieved.

Jai Hind.


Author: ‘Sardar’ Sanjay Matkar
Twitter: @sanjaymatkar

Tuesday, August 30, 2016

Maruti Car - From Extortion to Production......

Extortion, blackmail and abuse of power - 

The story of “Maruti Udyog Limited”


On 16 November 1970, a private limited company named Maruti Technical Services Private Limited (MTSPL) was launched by Sanjay Gandhi, the second son of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. He nominated himself as Managing Director of MTSPL with the second Director being Sonia Gandhi, the daughter-in-law of Indira Gandhi. The stated purpose of this company was to provide technology for manufacturing a “fully indigenous motor car”; (basically a car that was supposed to be 100% Indian in every way).

Sanjay Gandhi was known to be obsessed with cars and aircraft. Maintaining his family’s legacy, he failed to get a college degree, but Rolls–Royce (RR) of England must have seen some hidden talent in him, since he joined them as an intern in their manufacturing unit in the UK. The fact that he failed to complete his internship successfully is glossed over in history. Apparently, after only three years at RR he claimed that he had learnt all that was to be learnt about manufacturing cars, and this Gandhi returned to India with a dream, or so it is said.  



Using every resource at his command, including the office of the Prime Minister, Gandhi started his initial production of Maruti cars in the ramshackle truck-stop area of Delhi called Gulabi Bagh; with a chassis that he manufactured himself and parts that were scrounged from the back- alleys of Jama Masjid area. A refurbished Triumph motor-cycle engine was initially used to propel this contraption. On the business front, the Gandhi family used their political power to raise funds from industrialists and traders to fund this project. Those who refused felt the brunt of the dreaded MISA (Maintenance of Internal Security Act) and COFEPOSA (Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Act). Thus, through threats and blackmail investments flowed quickly into the project and Maruti Limited was registered under the Companies Act in June 1971, within six months of the initial company being formed. 

Three decades later Robert Vadra, son-in-law of the other Director, Sonia Gandhi of MTSPL / Maruti Limited would recreate this amazing feat of creating a fortune out of nothing.
In September 1971, with the full backing of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s cabinet, MTSPL was awarded a Letter-of-Intent to manufacture 50,000 cars annually. The Directorate General of Technical Development was arm-twisted by the then Minister of Industrial Development, 
Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed (who was later hand-picked by Indira Gandhi to become the President of India), to issue this LOI against all norms. While the LOI was being processed, Gandhi found a benefactor in the then 
Haryana Chief Minister Bansi Lal; who influenced the Central Industries Ministry by recommending Gandhi’s case and assuring land, water, electricity and finance to the project. The reason for this benevolence was that Bansi Lal was under attack at that time by his own party’s MLAs, who had submitted a memorandum of multiple allegations of corruption against him; to the President of India. Bansi Lal who was a shrewd and cunning politician, realized at the outset that the insurance of his political well-being was the younger son and political heir of Indira Gandhi.
And so it came to pass that fertile land near village Dundahera on Delhi-Gurgaon road was allocated to Maruti Limited at a throw-away price, despite the fact that the potential site for Maruti factory was within 1,000 yards of a military ammunition dump. Another Gandhi family factotum V.C. Shukla who was then the Minister of State for Defense Production, ensured that this military facility was shifted elsewhere so that there would be no hindrance to the dreams of the heir-to-the-throne. Low interest loans without collateral were extended to the project by the Industrial Finance Corporation of India, Central Bank of India and Punjab National Bank.
Laws were broken, institutions were corrupted and morality was thrown to the winds to ensure that the ‘People’s Car’ dream was realized. When the then Law Minister H.R. Gokhale tried to advise Sanjay Gandhi on the legalities of this project, he was shocked by the rude response from the scion of the Gandhi family. “Mr. Gokhale, your laws do not apply to me”, scoffed the man who thought that he knew it all. With this attitude of its founding Managing Director, Maruti Limited was in deep financial trouble towards the end of 1973.
As details of these irregularities leaked out, it proved to be a constant embarrassment to the government. Opposition leaders Atal Behari Vajpayee, George Fernandes, Madhu Limaye and others accused Indira of practicing the worst kind of nepotism. But this had no effect on Sanjay Gandhi. He merrily went on from one controversy to the next. Somewhere along the line, he managed to get his prototype tested at VRDE Hyderabad. It failed every test and was not declared road worthy. He tried upgrading his fully indigenous prototype, and fitted it with a German manufactured engine with the help of the engine manufacturer. This idea also failed. Design flaws in Gandhi’s Maruti car ranged from vibrations to steering problems to brake failure. Despite this, the Minister for Heavy Industries T.A.Pai granted an industrial license to Maruti on 22nd July 1974 for producing 50,000 cars. 
Pai was arm-twisted to do this by one R.K. Dhawan who started his career as a government typist but within a few years was the Personal Secretary to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, as well as her confidante who used his position to control flow of information and access to the PM. Interestingly, he would be a suspect in the investigation of the assassination of Indira Gandhi, with the investigating commission stating that ‘the needle of suspicion significantly points to his complicity or involvement’ (in the assassination). Dhawan weathered this storm and is currently a senior politician of the Congress (I) party.
As financial losses mounted, the wizard of ‘People’s Car’ started another company Maruti Technical Services (MTS), which was heavily funded by the failing Maruti Ltd. MTS then floated a third company, Maruti Heavy Vehicles which acquired scrapped road-rollers, refurbished them with a paint job and sold them as new. States ruled by the Congress party were forced to buy these at atrocious prices.
Politics interfered in this stuttering saga of Sanjay Gandhi’s dream project. His mother’s party was booted out of power in the 1977 general elections. The newly empowered Janata Government initiated an Inquiry Commission headed by Justice A.P.Gupta, and based on his reports; on March 06, 1978, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana ordered the winding up of Maruti Motors. The dream was dead via court order.
The Congress party came back into power in 1980, but before the Maruti experiment could be resurrected, Sanjay Gandhi in his unique style that ignored good advice; decided to perform aerobatic loops in a two-seater aircraft over Delhi’s Safdarjung area, lost control and crashed to his death.
Post his demise, Indira Gandhi decided to revive the project. Maruti Udyog Ltd was incorporated through the efforts of Dr V. Krishnamurthy, and was established in February 1981; though actual vehicle production commenced only in 1983, in Joint Venture with Suzuki Motors Japan.
It must be specified here that Suzuki Motors of Japan had absolutely nothing to do with the political, economic or legal malfeasances of Sanjay Gandhi, his mother or the Congress Party.
After the death of Sanjay Gandhi and on the request of his mother, it was Dr. V.Krishnamurthy; a highly respected bureaucrat who was Secretary in the Ministry of Industry till 1980, who did the spade work to evaluate various global car manufacturers to find the right partner for the People’s Car of India. Suzuki Japan was the ultimate choice. 
Dr Krishnamurty was appointed as the Chairman and CEO of the new entity Maruti Udyog Limited in 1981, and the rest as they say, is history.
The actual production started in 1983 with the introduction of the Maruti 800 car (depicted here sporting its original Sky Blue color)
 
which was based on the Suzuki Alto Kei/SS80, (depicted here in red) which was at that time the most modern car in Asia. 
In 1984, the Maruti Van with the same 3-cylinder engine as the 800 was launched.
In 1985; the Suzuki SJ410, 4WD off-road vehicle with a 970cc petrol engine was launched. This was renamed the ‘Gypsy’ in India 

and was designed with a longer tail-end than the original SJ410. 
                                                                                    

Suzuki also tried to introduce the Maruti Pick-up mini-truck in India, but that turned out to be a market flop.  
                                                               
The irony of the whole sordid saga is that the 100% Indian designed and manufactured ‘People’s Car’, started its journey in India as a 100% Japanese imported car, since the first few hundred vehicles of the car and van were fully assembled imports. Initially, 74% of the company was owned by the Government of India and 26% by Suzuki Japan. As of May 2007, the Government sold its complete share holding and no longer has any stake in Maruti Udyog. 
And there we have it, the saga of total failure to popular success; as witnessed by history.

Note: This post was originally published in www.newnviews.online
I thank them for the opportunity.


Friday, July 8, 2016

If not now, when….. ?


Recently a close friend of mine accused me of being Anti-Modi, (Against the Gov of our respected prime minister Shri. Narendra Modi). This accusation caught me by surprise, since I do not consider myself as anti-establishment. His clarification was that I should not criticize or express negative opinions against the current BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party) Govs at the Center or in our State of Maharashtra.

My counter argument is that, as a Citizen of my country Bharat; I have the Constitutional Right to ask questions from my Gov ministers at every level; municipal, state or central / Union, including the Prime Minister. I also hold this very right as a Voter.

So, what are my expectations from the NaMo Gov as it is popularly known?

1) Enforcement of Civil Order and Social Discipline

    NaMo has started off and is consistently pushing the ‘Swatch Bharat Abhiyan’ (Clean India Effort) since 02nd October 2014. It is now 2 years 8 months since this effort was put into action, yet except for the railway stations which are sparkling clean, the mountains of garbage on the streets of our cities and towns has not reduced even one bit, forget about being removed totally. The ministry of Urban Development has the lead in making our country garbage free and clean. It consistently fails in this effort. 

The Prime Minister requests our citizens time and again; not to litter, spit, urinate or worse on the road-side or on the foot-paths. The citizens don’t care and continue defacing the country. The NaMo Government has already imposed taxes on the tax-paying community by ½%, levying the Swachh Bharat Cess (SBC) on us. But, the government is either unwilling or unable to enforce existing rules and regulations to force citizens to be follow social discipline and enforce public cleanliness. Why doesn’t NaMo repeal the SBC and take money as punitive fines from the offenders who throw garbage on the streets irresponsibly and are not prosecuted for the same?

In the area of civil discipline; every footpath (except those in VIP areas or next to the Chief Minister’s offices) are occupied by hawkers, squatters and those with vested interests. This problem is growing rapidly and the reason behind it is the slum rehabilitation efforts. Every squatter and hawker not only expects, but demands a free house from government as if it’s their God-gifted right, which the government obliges using our tax-payer money. Here is the good part of the government playing the role of ‘Good Samaritan’ with our money and gifting houses to the poverty stricken. The recipients of this largess sell the houses in open market the moment they get an allotment and then they are back to occupying our foot-paths asking for a free house, once again. 

All this, while the hard-working, tax-paying middle class does not qualify to be even considered for free housing, much less being on any list or quota to receive one.

In the area of traffic control and vehicular movements, NaMo Gov has basically given up even trying to enforce the law. The Motor Vehicle Act 1998; we are told, will be enhanced soon in 2016 to enable the Gov to prosecute guilty drivers severely. The Gov quietly avoids any mention of law-enforcement. At any given point or location in our country, we can see vehicles parked in no-parking zones without a care or badly parked, double-parked, or its various variations. This indiscipline hinders the flow of traffic (I am not using the words smooth flow, because it is something unknown in our country for the general public), to the point that people are stressed, delayed for no reason, more fuel is expended than is necessary and overall there is a atmosphere of despair, disgust and bad feelings. Who is responsible for this? If the primary culprits are the undisciplined drivers, then the Gov is equally responsible due to its inability or incapability to enforce the law.

Yes, my dear Gov ministers and officials, it is your duty to “enforce” the law, not make it optional for people to decide whether to obey the laws or not.

Maybe the Gov can start with ensuring that traffic police actually do some work of traffic law enforcement while on duty, rather than sit on their Gov issued motor-cycles, keep busy with their mobile phones and fleece money from sundry commercial vehicles that come across their paths. Traffic control duty should not be restricted to ensuring the smooth flow of VVIP movements where a fleet of vehicles with red flashing lights and sirens go by at high speed as traffic cops push the other vehicles towards the side of the road. When the VVIP convoy vanishes, so do the cops. Add to this rash driving of vehicles by general public, driving on the wrong side of the road, driving at excessive speeds that result in multiple deaths of innocents and driving vehicles on the foot-paths if there is some space available. It is not only the supporters of NaMo and the vote-bank of BJP who are fed-up of Gov inaction on this issue; but every person on the roads is fed-up because their needs are being blissfully ignored by the NaMo Gov at Center and State levels.
 
2) Appeasement of Muslims

The NaMo Gov has followed the policy of Muslim appeasement as rigorously as the earlier Govs of the other political parties. After the fire and brimstone lectures about “Sabka Sath, Sabka Vikas” (Everybody together, everybody’s Progress) prior to being elected, the NaMo Gov is quietly avoiding any mention about the Uniform Civil Code, removal of Article 370 with reference to Kashmir and is in the process of introducing Sharia Banking in Gujarat, which may be extended to other States as well. To know more about Sharia banking in India please click here

Apart from this development under the Narendra Modi Gov; Muslims have long been running a parallel judicial system in this country under Sharia Law. The Supreme Court of India has already ruled that “No religion is allowed to curb anyone's fundamental rights," stating further that Indian Law does not recognize Sharia Court rulings. Read more about this ruling here

Since Sharia law is allowed for Muslims then why not a Court System perhaps under the interpretations of the Shrimad Bhagwat Gita for the Hindus? What if the Jewish community; which has been recognized as a ‘minority’ community by the Government of Maharashtra, demands that they be allowed to run their own judicial system as per the Halakha (which are the collective body of Jewish religious laws derived from the Written and Oral Torah)? Will the NaMo Gov allow this? If not, then why the special treatment towards the Muslim community?

And most importantly; does this not weaken the letter and spirit of the ‘Constitution of India’ that states in the preamble that “Equality of Status and of opportunity and to promote all Fraternity assuring dignity of the individual……” which on-paper assures every citizen the “three dimensions of Equality – Political, Economic and Civic”?

3) Enforcement of Law and Order across the Nation: 

Whether it is prominently the States of Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Kerala and Bengal; and the other States, law and order situation is becoming grim on a daily basis. The voters had expected that improving the law & order situation would be a priority for the NaMo Gov and there would be an effort to train the police, increase their personnel strength and treat them as human beings. Unfortunately, apart from stating now and then that ‘Law and Order’ is the responsibility of the respective State, the Union Gov has not contributed positively towards the safety of citizens. Speeches by the Home Minister Shri Rajnath Singh about flexing muscles which seem non-existent, does not impress the voters and neither do they scare the criminals or prevent crime. The Voters want action on-the-ground and this has not happened. The usual excuses will not work because they are no longer acceptable by the Voters.

The reality is that we have an extremely serious problem of lack of enforcement of Law & Order; be it in the areas of crime, social responsibility or civic duties. Pleading and requesting will not work. Criminal prosecution, monetary penalties and enforcement of existing laws without fear and favor are required; because this was one reason why Shri. Narendra Modi was elected Prime Minister by voters across all the social strata.

My two questions to the Prime Minister are:

(1) If not you, then who?             and,
(2) If not now, then when?
 

Jai Hind. Vande Mataram !     

Thursday, January 7, 2016

Tweeting the ‘Drums of War’



 On 2nd January, 2016; a heavily armed group of Pakistan based terrorists infiltrated into India and attacked the Pathankot Air base in Punjab State. In the initial battle, four terrorists and three security persons died in combat. Three more security persons who were grievously injured died in hospital, raising the death toll to six. The initial battle lasted for over 17 hours and then sporadically continued till January 4th, when the final terrorist was declared killed by the security forces. The final death toll was 6 terrorist / attackers, 1 civilian and 7 Indian security people (5 from Defense Service Corps, 1 Indian Air-Force Commando and 1 officer of the National Security Guard).


The social media has been afire with known and unknown “experts” giving their opinion regardless of the facts on the ground. Most are incensed that the Govt. of India has not yet launched a counter-attack on Pakistan to “teach them a lesson”. Politicians from all parties first condemned the terror attack and then each other for lack of reaction to this terrorist attack. Much has been said about the “inefficient conduct” of the Government machinery and the Armed Forces response to containing and exterminating the terrorist.

The first issue that should be taken into account is that the terrorists were wearing Indian Army uniforms. The initial casualties of the security forces happened because of this deception. The subsequent casualties that happened were due to Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) that were encountered by the security people. IEDs by their very definition are highly unstable and have a large circumference of damage when they explode. They are also extremely difficult and dangerous to disarm, since every IED bomb-maker has individual design techniques. 

The second issue being raised is that of the delay in response to the attack. This is a blatant false-hood being perpetuated by those who want to harm our Nation, especially many from the main-stream- media (MSM). The reality is that Indian command and control mechanism was very pro-active and the only delay was due to logistics constraints (moving troops and equipment to the battle field) and not decision making, as is claimed by many.


Most of the anger being vented by the social media “experts” seems to be based on the singular fact that the kill ratio of terrorist to brave-hearts (6: 7) is unacceptable. Does that mean that if the country had lost only a couple of our soldiers, the anger would have been less? Let us be very clear, every individual loss of life in the protection of our Nation is a loss of a hero that we cannot afford to lose. However, the reality is that, every battlefield throws up casualties, and we have to bear the brunt of loss of our troops again and again. This very anger and frustration is driving the need for a war with Pakistan. And therein lies the trap that needs to be avoided.

If India does go to war in retaliations against frequent terrorist attacks that originate from Pakistan territory, what would be the objective of this war? What would be the physical goals to achieve, so that we in India can get the feelings of a satisfactory revenge?

Would the objective (goal) be the invasion and take-over of POK (Pakistan Occupied Kashmir)? Would that be a fitting response? Or would the objective of war be the occupation of entire country of Pakistan? Assuming that either option is the objective, how long would the Indian forces stay in the captured territory? Would the occupation be time-bound, or perpetual? Will India declare the captured territory as irrevocable parts of India? What will be the legal status of the current residents of this territory? Will they become Indian citizens once the territory is annexed? What is the guarantee that the current residents will welcome Indians as liberators and heroes, and not fight Indian forces as their enemies?

The 2003 invasion of Iraq by USA and its coalition of the unwilling, is a clear example that occupying a sovereign nation is fraught with dangers; physical, geopolitical and financial. A war always results with the death of soldiers in thousands and depletion of finances by the millions. The quagmire that the Western countries find themselves in over the last 12-15 years is self explanatory. Should India follow this “definitely-will-fail-make-us-bankrupt” policy of war? That’s a thought that requires some deep considerations.

In fact, the wars of the 21st century can no longer be fought on the killing fields of borders between nations. Current and NextGen wars will be fought on two widely diverse battle-fields. One will be in the arena of global finance and economic strength. The winners will be defined by their robust and strong economy, industrial growth, financial reserves and respectable GDP. Wars will be won by literally drowning the enemy into global debt, negative growth and a broken financial system. The current government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi has already shown its strong performance in this area. The economy of India is on a strong growth and nothing (except maybe natural disasters will be able to stop this). Compared to the Indian economy, Pakistan is a perennially destitute nation that is dependent on financial hand-outs from USA, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

The second arena of war is War-by-Proxy. Here, Pakistan has the distinctive advantage over India. Pakistan has been the sponsor of such warfare since the invasion of Afghanistan by the former Soviet Union in December 1979. It was in Pakistan that the initial “Mujahideen” (guerilla warriors) armies were raised and trained. In its roots, mujahideen refers to any person who performs jihad. “Jihad” is the term, used to define the Islamic conquests during the early history of Islam, and now is defined by armed guerilla attacks across the world. Today’s Jihadi groups are based in Pakistan and Afghanistan; but they have been financed at various times by the USA, other European nations, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and many Arabic non-government organizations. In Pakistan itself they have the backing and blessings of the Pakistan Army’s Inter-Services-Intelligence (ISI) that is increasingly seen to be acting on its own agenda that is radically different from the official policies of the democratically elected Govt. of Pakistan.

The decades long lead by Pakistan in the arena of proxy-war over India has been the prime reason that India has not been able to respond back adequately and immediately to terrorist attacks. As a matter of records, it is not only Pakistan that has been indulging in proxy war against India. China has been doing the same by funding and sponsoring the Communist Party of India (Marxist), Russia by its funding of the other communists; USA and Western powers through the use of church groups that spread Christianity and sponsor religious conversions in India and neighboring countries, and Saudi Arabia by funding Wahhibi madrasas that sponsor local terrorist activities.

It is rumored that the current Government has understood the implications and advantages of proxy-warfare. Yet, to-date there has been no reports of India sponsoring any violent activity in a foreign country. It is a matter of pride that India’s nascent proxy war effort is overt and involves assistance to neighboring countries in the form of financial aid, technical aid to build infra-structure, medical and humanitarian aid as a disaster response and a global cultural "attack" with the publicity of the benefits of Yoga exercises.

Whether there will be any covert attacks against Pakistan is a matter of debate. Whether any infrastructure for sponsoring armed conflicts inside Pakistan is being formed is also a matter of wild speculation. All that we-the-People of India need to know is that we are a financially stable, economically strong Nation with a majority population that is not afraid of terrorism. And that is our road to prosperity and happiness.

Vande Mataram!











The changing landscape of terrorism and its funding.

  In the last two years (2023 / 2024) deaths from terrorism have increased by over 22% and are now at their highest levels since 2017, thoug...